★VALS INDEX
47.6%
+/- 21.6
Accuracy
⏱VALS INDEX
19.8s
Latency (median)
$VALS INDEX
$0.5073
Cost / Test (1P-est)
SCORE STATUSscored
TEST SETS13
RECORDED TRIALS424
CUSTOM PASS42%
Industry benchmarks
Accuracyattempts · responded
GPQA_DIAMOND
GPQA Diamond
23.1%
52 attempts · 34 responded
HUMANEVAL_PLUS
HumanEval+
36.1%
36 attempts · 13 responded
IFEVAL
IFEval
68.2%
151 attempts · 146 responded
MMLU_PRO
MMLU-Pro
63.0%
100 attempts · 100 responded
Custom 9-task suite
Mean /5n=trials
CUSTOM
reasoning_multistep
★
5.00
11 trials
CUSTOM
summarize
★
3.64
11 trials
CUSTOM
code_gen_long
★
3.45
11 trials
CUSTOM
code_debug
★
3.42
12 trials
CUSTOM
json_strict
★
3.08
12 trials
CUSTOM
agentic_tool_use
-
0.67
3 trials
CUSTOM
refactor_existing_code
-
0.67
3 trials
CUSTOM
agentic_prompt
-
0.64
11 trials
CUSTOM
creative_write
-
0.45
11 trials
Cross-judge validation
m3 vs Fable-5 Δ
No judge bias detected on this model — m3 and Fable-5 agree across all tasks.
Per-task distribution
Score
All trials on this page were run through the harness. Industry suites use deterministic family-specific reference graders (no LLM judge). The custom suite is graded by consensus of minimax-m3 + claude-fable-5. See /industry/ for the full benchmark suite.