★VALS INDEX
44.4%
+/- 44.0
Accuracy
⏱VALS INDEX
48.7s
Latency (median)
$VALS INDEX
—
Cost / Test (1P-est)
SCORE STATUSscored
TEST SETS11
RECORDED TRIALS142
CUSTOM PASS36%
Industry benchmarks
Accuracyattempts · responded
GPQA_DIAMOND
GPQA Diamond
13.3%
60 attempts · 60 responded
IFEVAL
IFEval
75.6%
30 attempts · 30 responded
Custom 9-task suite
Mean /5n=trials
CUSTOM
agentic_tool_use
★
5.00
3 trials
CUSTOM
reasoning_multistep
★
5.00
8 trials
CUSTOM
summarize
★
3.00
8 trials
CUSTOM
json_strict
★
1.88
8 trials
CUSTOM
code_gen_long
-
1.12
8 trials
CUSTOM
creative_write
-
0.33
3 trials
CUSTOM
code_debug
-
0.25
8 trials
CUSTOM
agentic_prompt
-
0.00
3 trials
CUSTOM
refactor_existing_code
-
0.00
3 trials
Cross-judge validation
m3 vs Fable-5 Δ
No judge bias detected on this model — m3 and Fable-5 agree across all tasks.
Per-task distribution
Score
All trials on this page were run through the harness. Industry suites use deterministic family-specific reference graders (no LLM judge). The custom suite is graded by consensus of minimax-m3 + claude-fable-5. See /industry/ for the full benchmark suite.