★VALS INDEX
21.6%
+/- 5.8
Accuracy
⏱VALS INDEX
64.8s
Latency (median)
$VALS INDEX
$0.5048
Cost / Test (1P-est)
SCORE STATUSscored
TEST SETS13
RECORDED TRIALS556
CUSTOM PASS50%
Industry benchmarks
Accuracyattempts · responded
GPQA_DIAMOND
GPQA Diamond
15.4%
130 attempts · 21 responded
HUMANEVAL_PLUS
HumanEval+
25.0%
40 attempts · 10 responded
IFEVAL
IFEval
27.8%
130 attempts · 46 responded
MMLU_PRO
MMLU-Pro
18.0%
200 attempts · 68 responded
Custom 9-task suite
Mean /5n=trials
CUSTOM
code_gen_long
★
5.00
8 trials
CUSTOM
json_strict
★
5.00
3 trials
CUSTOM
reasoning_multistep
★
5.00
3 trials
CUSTOM
agentic_tool_use
★
4.40
5 trials
CUSTOM
summarize
-
3.88
8 trials
CUSTOM
refactor_existing_code
-
3.60
5 trials
CUSTOM
agentic_prompt
★
3.38
8 trials
CUSTOM
code_debug
-
1.50
8 trials
CUSTOM
creative_write
-
0.00
8 trials
Cross-judge validation
m3 vs Fable-5 Δ
No judge bias detected on this model — m3 and Fable-5 agree across all tasks.
Per-task distribution
Score
All trials on this page were run through the harness. Industry suites use deterministic family-specific reference graders (no LLM judge). The custom suite is graded by consensus of minimax-m3 + claude-fable-5. See /industry/ for the full benchmark suite.